JCE Online Journal of Chemical EducationDivision of Chemical Education, American Chemical SocietyAmerican Chemical Society
 | Subscriptions  | Software Orders  | Support  | Contributors  | Advertisers  | 

JCE Print

JCE Digital Library

JCE Software

Only@JCE Online

About JCE


  Home > JCE Print > Journal of Chemical Education > Issues > 2006  > September  >
Chemical Education Today
Letters
Equilibrium Constants and Water Activity Revisited
E. J. Behrman
Department of Biochemistry, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210
Cover
September 2006
Vol. 83 No. 9
p. 1290

Full Text
David Keeports uses the definition that the activity of water is 1(1). I do not take exception to his arguments, but I would like to point out a situation in which it is pedagogically advantageous to use the molar concentration of water instead. It is useful in teaching the effects of structure on acid strength to compare, inter alia, water with primary alcohols. We expect that methanol, ethanol, and water will have closely similar pKa values since substitution of a methyl group for a hydrogen generally affects the acid strength by no more than a factor of 2 or so. (Ballinger and Long (2) give the pKa values for methanol, ethanol, and water as 15.5, 16, and 15.7). The conventional way to write the dissociation constant for methanol (or any other acid) is: Ka=[H+][MeO]/[MeOH]. (In this and other equations the positively charged species stands for all positively charged species not the non-existent proton.) If the dissociation constant for water is expressed in this form, the corresponding pKa is 15.7 (at 25 °C). If it is expressed with a defined activity for water = 1, then pKa = 14 making it appear (inexplicably) considerably stronger than methanol. That is, if we treat the dissociation of water in the same way that we treat other acids, we can make a useful comparison with other structures. On the same basis, the pKa for the hydronium ion (or rather the sum of the protonated species) is about -1.7. Cox gives a balanced discussion of the theoretical problems (3).

Literature Cited

  1. Keeports, D. J. Chem. Educ. 2005, 82, 999.
  2. Ballinger, P.; Long, F. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1960, 82, 795. See also, March, J. Advanced Organic Chemistry, 4th ed.; Wiley: New York, 1992; p 251, and references therein.
  3. Cox, R. A. Adv. Phys. Org. Chem. 2000, 35, 2–4.

See the author's reply.

More Information
*
Citation
Behrman, E. J. J. Chem. Educ. 2006 83 1290.
*
Keywords
Acids / Bases; Aqueous Solution Chemistry; Curriculum; Equilibrium; First-Year Undergraduate / General; Misconceptions / Discrepant Events; Physical Chemistry; Upper-Division Undergraduate; Water / Water Chemistry
*
History
Created:
Last Updated:
8/7/2006
8/18/2006
  Home > JCE Print > Journal of Chemical Education > Issues > 2006  > September  > Page 1290


Subscriptions

JCE HS CLIC

Our Secondary School editors work hard to distill all the JCE materials to produce a fraction of particular interest to high school teachers. We call it CLIC.


Contributions Welcome
JCE welcomes your submission

Advertisers
In recent years we have worked hard to better match our advertisers with our readers. When shopping for chemistry education materials, visit our advertisers' WWW sites first.

Be An Ambassador
Take JCE along on your outreach missions. Copies of the Journal, guest access to JCE Online, our publications catalog, and more are available for your participants.